Search Results

Tariffs have long been a tool for governments to manage international trade . In today’s rapidly changing global economy, tariffs have taken on a newfound significance, particularly in relation to national security . Across many countries, including the United States, policymakers are increasingly examining how tariffs can support national interests in addition to economic growth. National Security Tariffs National security tariffs are tariffs imposed on goods and services that are considered essential for a nation’s defense and overall security. These measures are not merely economic tools but are underpinned by concerns that rely heavily on the ability to protect domestic industries that contribute to national defense. The urgency of protecting supply chains became clear during the COVID-19 pandemic, as countries faced shortages in essential goods. High angle view of a country’s national flag representing national pride and security measures. Countries justify these tariffs through various rationales. Some believe that reducing dependency on foreign goods enhances national security against geopolitical risks. For example, metals and energy resources are often at the forefront of such discussions, with governments arguing that domestic production capability is essential for defense. The Economic Implications While the primary focus on national security tariffs is to protect border integrity and national interests, there are significant economic implications attached to them. By imposing tariffs, a government can stimulate domestic production, but it can also create market distortions. For instance, the tariffs on steel and aluminum imposed by the Trump administration ranged up to 25 percent and 10 percent, respectively. While these measures were aimed at protecting American manufacturers, they led to increased costs for industries reliant on these metals, such as automotive and construction. According to estimates, these tariffs ultimately resulted in an increase in prices for consumers and potential job losses in other sectors. Eye-level view of industrial machinery in a manufacturing plant highlighting the importance of domestic industries. Furthermore, the economic repercussions often extend beyond national borders. Partner countries might retaliate with their tariffs, leading to trade wars that can damage international relations and economic stability. The U.S.-China trade conflict serves as a pertinent example, where the imposition of tariffs affected global supply chains and escalated tensions in international trade. Legal Framework and Section 232 The legal framework surrounding national security tariffs is not straightforward. One of the major legislative acts employed in the United States is section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. This section allows the president to impose tariffs when it is determined that imports threaten national security. To utilize this law, the Department of Commerce may conduct investigations that look into whether imported goods are harming U.S. national security. The results of these investigations can lead to significant changes in tariff policies, ultimately impacting various industries and consumer prices. Case Studies: National Security Tariffs in Action To understand the nuances involved with national security tariffs, it's useful to explore some real-world examples. Steel and Aluminum Tariffs (2018) : As previously mentioned, tariffs were enacted under section 232 to protect U.S. steel and aluminum industries. The goal was to safeguard jobs and limit excess foreign competition. Many steel producers saw increased demand, but industries that rely on steel reported rising costs and job cuts. Automotive Industry Tariffs : In 2019, the Trump administration considered imposing tariffs on imported vehicles and auto parts under the guise of national security. While the tariffs were ultimately not enacted, the mere consideration created uncertainty in the automotive market, causing manufacturers and suppliers to re-evaluate their operations. Western Technology Restrictions : More recently, tariffs and restrictions have been employed in the technology sector, particularly concerning telecommunications and computing technologies from foreign companies due to national security concerns. Such measures directly affect supply chains and access to advanced technologies, further complicating global trade relations. The Road Ahead : Balancing Act As nations navigate the complexities of national security tariffs, a pragmatic approach is essential. While these tariffs can provide vital support to domestic industries, they should be implemented judiciously to avoid detrimental effects on relationships with trading partners. Policymakers should consider more nuanced methods to protect essential industries without significantly harming the global economy. For example, investment in domestic production through subsidies and incentives may be a way to bolster national security without relying solely on tariffs. Additionally, future trade agreements should incorporate frameworks that allow countries to collaborate on security issues, thus reducing the reliance on unilateral tariff measures. Wide angle view of an industrial ship in a busy port symbolizing international trade and its challenges. Closing Thoughts on Tariff Measures National security tariffs represent a complex intersection of economics, international relations, and national interests. The implications of imposing tariffs should not be disconnected from their broader effects on global trade or stockpiling domestic supply. As the world continues to grapple with unprecedented challenges, including geopolitical tensions and public health emergencies, the landscape of national security tariffs will remain in focus. Sensible policy choices are necessary to navigate this challenging terrain while ensuring that the economy remains resilient and adaptable. In conclusion, while the primary aim of national security tariffs is to protect vital industries, ensuring sustainable growth necessitates a careful consideration of both the benefits and costs. As we look to the future, it is crucial for governments to engage in dialogues that foster international cooperation, coupled with domestic safeguarding strategies that enhance overall security without isolating economies. Only through such collaboration can nations capitalize on the benefits of trade while ensuring collective security and prosperity. Resource Library Learn more about Trade Law. We have a series of articles highlighting the key components of international trade and compliance. Resources Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Navigating a Trade Storm: Michelle Schulz on the Real Impact of Tariffs June 16, 2025 Road Dog News Road Dog Trucking / Sirius XM Host: Mark Willis In an interview on SiriusXM’s Road Dog Trucking , Schulz Trade Law founder Michelle Schulz explains how rapidly shifting U.S. tariff policies are affecting businesses from coast to coast. Real Impact of Tariffs The Confusion Behind the Curtain Michelle Schulz, a 20-year veteran in international trade law, outlines the growing complexity in U.S. tariff enforcement. With tariffs fluctuating and enforced under emergency powers, many companies have created internal “tariff working groups” just to stay updated. “Many companies are confused… the tariffs have changed so often. Some are front-loading, some are delaying customs entries. It’s like a yo-yo.” — Michelle Schulz Schulz points out that while the White House pushes a “Made in America” agenda, many manufacturers are struggling to adapt due to unpredictable policy changes and supply chain uncertainty. Real Impact of Tariffs Ripple Effects on Manufacturing and Jobs The impact of tariffs has extended far beyond policy confusion — manufacturers are facing real, immediate pressures. “Steel and aluminum tariffs are now up to 50%. That hits hard. Either pay the price or source domestically — both are costly options.” Schulz highlights that high input costs are forcing companies to scale back, delay hiring, or reconsider major investments in equipment. The result? A slowdown in high-tech manufacturing and shrinking return on investment across industries. Real Impact of Tariffs Global Shifts and Legal Frontiers With tariffs being implemented under emergency statutes, legal challenges are inevitable — and ongoing. “Courts are deciding issues they’ve never touched before… using emergency powers to implement tariffs is being questioned.” Meanwhile, companies that once relocated from China to Mexico are now seeing tariffs rise again — making every move riskier. As Schulz notes, many are turning to free trade zones and special programs to survive. “Changing countries doesn’t work so great anymore.” Despite the uncertainty, Schulz Trade Law is helping companies navigate these waters daily. “We aim to reduce confusion, make sure companies are properly classifying their products, and not overpaying due to misvaluations,” she adds. Road Dog News  (Road Dog Trucking) Host : Mark Willis About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

This Morning with Gordon Deal June 13, 2025 Tariff ruling is put on hold while Trump administration appeals, U.S., Israel waiting for Hamas to respond to ceasefire proposal for Gaza, and buying 100% made in America is really, really hard. Trump’s “Take It or Leave It” Trade Approach: Leverage, Frameworks, and Impact on U.S. Businesses and Consumers Trade Deadlines and the Reality of Negotiations President Trump's aggressive “take it or leave it” approach to trade deals may not be effective, according to trade attorney Michelle Schulz . While it appears decisive, Schulz emphasizes that real trade negotiations are complex and slow-moving. “Trade talks take months, maybe years. With a hard deadline, we’re only going to get frameworks—not enough detail for industry to use practically.” She warns that these frameworks lack the substance businesses need, particularly in specifying tariff codes, duty rates, and country of origin—all essential for compliance and planning. U.S. Leverage and the Role of Tariffs The U.S. still holds substantial leverage in trade talks due to its import demand. Schulz affirms that tariffs are being used as negotiation tools—though their legal basis is contested. “We import a great deal from different countries… that leverage matters, especially with countries like China whose exports have fallen.” However, she notes concern over the use of an “emergency statute” to justify tariffs, a matter the Court of International Trade may dispute. Consumer Impact and the Manufacturing Dilemma Consumers haven’t yet fully felt the impact, but they will. The tariffs are in place until at least mid-August 2025, with appeals pending. Schulz explains that clients are already raising prices and reevaluating business models. “Clients are shocked by the duties they owe. It’s causing losses and price increases that will eventually hit consumers.” While the tariffs may encourage U.S. manufacturing, Schulz points out that America’s strengths lie in high-tech exports, not low-cost goods. Rising steel prices could hurt downstream industries, even if steelmakers benefit. Show:  This Morning with Gordon Deal  // @GordonDeal // Facebook About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Trump’s China Trade Deal: Framework or Finalized? June 11, 2025 EWT News Nightly EWTN Global Catholic Network Michelle Schulz @ 0:47 Hopeful Headlines, But Not Yet a Done Deal President Trump announced a new trade agreement with China, celebrated as a breakthrough by White House officials. However, trade attorney Michelle Schulz , founder of Schulz Trade Law , urged caution on the China Trade Deal: “It’s still a framework… It gives us a little bit of hope, but we wait and see.” The deal reportedly revives terms discussed during the May Geneva truce and was outlined during late-night negotiations in London. As of now, neither President Xi nor Trump has signed it, leaving global markets in limbo. Tariff Tensions and Rare Earth Realities The deal outlines a 55% tariff on Chinese goods  and a 10% tariff on U.S. goods , prompting questions about economic leverage and equity. “I’m a little skeptical,” Schulz noted. “China has quite a bit of leverage… We need rare earth minerals to make technology, cars—pretty much anything.” She questioned why the U.S. would accept such an imbalanced tariff arrangement, especially given China’s dominance in critical mineral supply chains essential to U.S. manufacturing. Deal or Delay: Details Will Decide Despite headlines touting a deal, Schulz emphasized the process is far from over. “The devil’s in the details… We’re looking at about mid-August for the details to be fleshed out.” Approval will likely hinge on complex factors such as tariff codes, exemptions, and actual Chinese concessions on mineral exports. Schulz concluded that while diplomatic momentum is promising, the legal and logistical groundwork remains unfinished.   EWTN Radio  (Catholic-oriented radio network)   Host : Tara Mergener // @TaraMergener About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Rare Earths vs. Microchips: Schulz Trade Law on the U.S.–China Trade Standoff June 10, 2025 700 WLM Radio Cincinnatti The Scott Sloan Show [ link to interview ] In an interview with WLW Radio Cincinnati , international trade attorney Michelle Schulz , founding partner of Schulz Trade Law, PLLC , offered expert analysis on the renewed U.S.–China trade negotiations. The talks, centered around rare earth minerals and microchip technology , have global economic and national security implications—and Schulz brought clarity to an otherwise murky geopolitical landscape. What's on the Table: Rare Earths for Chips At the heart of the negotiations is a 90-day suspension of tariffs  as both nations attempt to broker a deal. The U.S. heavily depends on China's rare earth minerals, which are critical components in everything from electric vehicles and smartphones to missile defense systems. Meanwhile, China seeks access to American microchip technology, which is essential for AI development and high-performance manufacturing. “It’s rare earth minerals versus microchips,” Schulz summarized. “China wants our microchips. We want their minerals. Both are essential to our respective economies and national defense.” Rare Earth Mining in Inner Mongolia – China’s global dominance in rare earth supply continues to shape trade policy. Why the Stakes Are So High Schulz noted that while the U.S. is working to onshore rare earth production, it faces environmental, economic, and logistical hurdles. Mining these elements domestically is possible, but complicated by complex separation processes and prior business failures. China, on the other hand, maintains a strategic advantage by controlling 90–100% of the global rare earth supply. According to Schulz, they understand how difficult it is for the U.S. to rebuild a domestic supply chain from scratch: “Their leverage is really pretty strong.” Microchip manufacturing in the U.S. – A critical sector at the center of U.S.-China trade negotiations. Courts, Compromises, and Corporate Espionage While the Court of International Trade  recently ruled against the current application of some tariffs, a 90-day injunction is in place, pending appeal. Schulz expects that by late summer, a partial compromise may emerge—but not a full resolution. She also highlighted a significant omission in the current talks: intellectual property protection . China’s long-standing pattern of IP theft has been largely ignored in these recent negotiations, despite its impact on American innovation and manufacturing. “My firm just had a meeting on corporate espionage. It’s everywhere. They're stealing our technology all the time.” Looking Ahead: What Can We Expect? When asked whether a full resolution is possible, Schulz remained cautiously realistic. “This won’t be resolved in a couple days in London. If anything happens, it’ll be a middle ground that doesn’t fully satisfy either party.” With implications stretching from the Court of Appeals to supply chain resiliency  and national security , Schulz’s insights underscore the importance of having seasoned legal counsel  navigate the complexities of international trade. Need guidance navigating international trade law, tariff compliance, or technology exports? Contact Schulz Trade Law, PLLC  for strategic legal solutions tailored to your business. WLW Radio, Cincinnati Scott Sloan Show Host:  Scott Sloan // https://www.facebook.com/scottsloan700WLW // @scottsloan If your business is affected by new or existing tariffs or needs strategic guidance on international trade compliance, contact Schulz Trade Law today. Our team of seasoned trade lawyers  can help you navigate the shifting legal landscape with agility and confidence. About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Tariffs and Their Impact on Global Trade Policies June 11, 2025 To learn more about Trade Law, visit our resource library Trade tariffs have become a focal point in discussions surrounding global trade, especially in recent years. In an interconnected world, where economies rely heavily on one another, the implications of tariffs can be profound. This blog post will delve into trade tariffs, their definitions, types, impacts on global trade policies, and practical implications for businesses and consumers. What are Trade Tariffs? Trade tariffs are taxes imposed by a government on imported goods. Their primary purpose is to increase the cost of foreign products, making domestically produced goods more competitive. Tariffs can serve several functions, including protecting emerging industries, generating government revenue, and influencing trade balances. Tariffs can be classified into two main categories: specific tariffs and ad valorem tariffs . Specific tariffs impose a fixed fee on a specific quantity of a product, whereas ad valorem tariffs are calculated as a percentage of the product's value. This distinction can result in varying impacts on different trading partners and types of goods. A busy port demonstrates the importance of global trade. The effectiveness of tariffs has been a subject of much debate. While they protect local industries, critics argue that tariffs can lead to increased prices for consumers and strained international relations. Impacts of Trade Tariffs on Global Trade Policies Trade tariffs can significantly influence global trade policies by shifting the dynamics of international trade. When one country imposes tariffs, its trading partners may retaliate, leading to a cycle of trade disputes known as a "trade war." This can alter existing trade agreements and prompt negotiations to amend or create new policies. For example, the trade tensions between the United States and China led to a series of tariff hikes from both sides. China responded to U.S. tariffs with its own set of tariffs on American goods, impacting industries ranging from agriculture to technology. These actions illustrate how tariffs can quickly escalate into broader geopolitical issues that affect not just the countries involved, but also global markets. Global trade agreements can be affected by tariff policies. The ripple effects of tariffs extend beyond simple costs. They can influence economic growth rates, currency values, and job creation in both domestic and foreign markets. For instance, a country that imposes tariffs may experience short-term benefits, but in the long run, it could harm its industries that depend on imported raw materials. The Role of Section 301 in Trade Tariffs In the context of trade tariffs, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the U.S. government to impose tariffs on imported goods that it determines are unfairly affecting American businesses. This legislation enables the federal government to respond to trade practices that violate international agreements. Countries such as China often find themselves at the center of Section 301 investigations due to allegations of intellectual property theft or forced technology transfers. By leveraging Section 301, the U.S. attempts to level the playing field, showcasing the intricate balance between protectionism and free trade. Trade legislation, such as Section 301, impacts tariff policies. The application of Section 301 illustrates the complexities of global trade policies, as it affects tariffs and encourages countries to negotiate more favorable trade agreements. Short-Term vs. Long-Term Effects of Tariffs The immediate effects of tariffs can often be observed in fluctuating prices and supply chain disruptions. For instance, when tariffs are imposed, companies may raise prices to offset their increased costs. Consumers see a rise in prices not just for imported goods, but also for domestically produced items that face less competition. In the long term, however, the implications can be broader. One potential outcome is decreased competitiveness. For example, if domestic industries rely too heavily on tariff protection, they may become complacent and fail to innovate or improve efficiency. This lack of competition can hinder overall economic growth. Additionally, tariffs can lead to a reallocation of resources in the economy. Companies that depend on imported components may be forced to seek alternatives, leading to inefficiencies. This kind of market distortion can create barriers to entry for new businesses and diminish consumer choices in the market. Recommendations for Businesses Navigating Tariffs Businesses can adopt strategies to mitigate the challenges posed by trade tariffs. Here are some actionable recommendations: Assess Supply Chains : Regularly review your supply chains to identify potential vulnerabilities related to tariffs. This can highlight areas where alternatives may be more cost-effective. Explore Tariff Exemptions : Stay informed about regulations and potential exemption programs that may apply to your products. For instance, certain goods might qualify for lower tariffs under specific trade agreements. Diversify Markets : Consider expanding your market presence to countries with fewer tariffs. This can reduce dependence on any single market and provide resilience against future tariff changes. Invest in Domestic Production : If your business is heavily reliant on imported goods, evaluate the feasibility of shifting some production to domestic facilities. While this may involve initial investments, it can safeguard against tariff fluctuations. Engage with Trade Experts : Consult with legal and trade experts, especially when navigating complex regulations like those surrounding Section 301. Their guidance can help ensure compliance and optimize your strategy. Enhancing Global Cooperation Amid Tariff Challenges The rise of tariffs highlights the pressing need for enhanced global cooperation. Countries need to engage in dialogue to address trade imbalances and negotiate agreements that promote fair competition. Organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) play an essential role in this context by providing a platform for countries to resolve trade disputes collaboratively. Moreover, bilateral and multilateral trade agreements can serve as tools for reducing tariffs and fostering economic partnerships. Countries that commit to working together can better manage the adverse effects of tariffs on global trade. Countries collaborating to create trade partnerships can mitigate tariff impacts. In conclusion, trade tariffs have a lasting impact on global trade policies, economics, and the relationships between nations. By understanding their effects and implementing strategic measures, businesses can better navigate the challenges associated with tariffs and contribute to a more cooperative global trading environment. Resource Library Learn more about Trade Law We have a series of articles highlighting the key components of international trade and compliance. Resources Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

This Morning with Gordon Deal May 30, 2025 Tariff ruling is put on hold while Trump administration appeals, U.S., Israel waiting for Hamas to respond to ceasefire proposal for Gaza, and buying 100% made in America is really, really hard. Michelle Schulz  at 2:15 Trump-Era Tariffs Explained In a recent interview, international trade attorney Michelle Schulz shed light on the complex legal landscape of trade tariffs. The conversation centered on the Court of International Trade's recent block of certain Trump-era tariffs, which could potentially result in customs refunding previously collected duties. Schulz explained that while some specific tariffs related to Mexico, Canada, and China are being challenged, many other tariffs remain intact, including those on steel and aluminum. The legal battle stems from the Trump administration's creative use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which the court now views as an overreach. Despite this setback, Schulz noted that the administration has multiple alternative routes to impose trade restrictions. These include Section 301 , which allows investigations into unfair trade practices, and Section 232 , which permits tariffs based on national security concerns. She described the original IEEPA strategy as particularly clever, noting its ingenious adaptation of a wartime-era economic powers act. The ongoing legal proceedings could ultimately reach the Supreme Court, leaving the final resolution of these trade restrictions uncertain. Meanwhile, trade negotiations continue, with potential new agreements on the horizon, particularly with countries like the United Kingdom. Show: https://thismorningwithgordondeal.com/ // @GordonDeal // [ Facebook ] Trade Law Actions to Consider: Legal challenges to tariffs Potential refund of previously paid duties Alternative legal mechanisms for imposing trade restrictions About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Appeals Court Rules Trump’s Tariffs Can Continue WBAP: The James Parker Show May 29, 2025 Michelle Schulz at 7:20 Michelle Schulz , an international trade lawyer from Dallas, discussed the legal complexities surrounding Trump's tariff actions on a radio show. She explained that Trump has been using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) from 1977 to impose tariffs, claiming emergencies related to trade deficits and drug trafficking. However, the Court of International Trade (CIT) has challenged this approach, arguing that these situations do not constitute true emergencies. Schulz highlighted that while previous presidents have imposed tariffs, Trump's method of using repeated executive orders is unprecedented. She detailed the typical legal processes for implementing tariffs, which usually involve lengthy agency reviews and investigations through provisions like Section 301 and Section 232 . The conversation explored the potential legal challenges, with Trump filing a motion to stay enforcement and plaintiffs having the opportunity to file counter-briefs. The CIT, described as the highest federal court for trade issues, will play a crucial role in determining the legality of these tariff actions. Schulz also shared her personal journey into international trade law, driven by a passion for international studies and a belief in the interconnectedness of global economies. She emphasized that international trade law is a dynamic field that continues to evolve with global business interactions. The James Parker Show [ Facebook ] @WBAP247NEWS Show:  The James Show Host:   James Parker  // @jamesparkershow https://www.facebook.com/thejamesparkershow/ https://www.instagram.com/jamesparkershow/ https://www.youtube.com/@thejamesparkershow About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Court of International Trade rules against Trump's Tariffs Texas State Networks (TSN) KRLD Radio Reporter:  Barbara Schwarz // @KRLDBarbara May 30, 2025 Michelle Schulz quoted on TSN Radio, KRLD The new report discusses a legal challenge to the Trump administration's tariffs. A three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade ruled that the president lacked the authority to impose these tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act  of 1977. Dallas trade attorney Michelle Schulz explained that the court found no genuine emergency justifying the tariffs, which were related to Liberation Day, narcotics trafficking, and border issues. The case involved plaintiffs from 12 states challenging the tariff implementation, highlighting the legal complexities surrounding presidential trade powers. TSN [ Facebook ] About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

June 3, 2025 U.S. Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: Economic Impact and Manufacturing Challenges in 2025 Wisconsin’s Afternoon News WTMJ Radio June 3 @ 4PM Interviewer: John Mercure // @JohnMercure // FB President Trump announced a 50% tariff on imported steel and aluminum , effective tomorrow, which is expected to increase consumer costs over time. International trade attorney Michelle Schulz discussed the impact, noting that the tariffs aim to boost U.S. manufacturing but may not be feasible immediately. Manufacturers are frustrated and uncertain about how to adapt, as steel and aluminum are essential for many products. The tariffs will force companies to either raise prices or shift production to the U.S., which will be costly and time-consuming. June 3, 4 PM: Health Warnings, Tariff Troubles, and Cheap Summer Movies Michelle Schulz at 00:20 U.S. Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: Economic Impact and Manufacturing Challenges in 2025 The landscape of international trade law is rapidly evolving, with recent policy shifts signaling significant implications for domestic manufacturing and global economic strategies. President Trump's proposed 50% tariff on imported steel and aluminum represents a critical inflection point for U.S. trade policy, challenging existing supply chains and potentially reshaping industrial production paradigms. As businesses and consumers navigate these complex regulatory changes, understanding the nuanced economic consequences becomes paramount for strategic decision-making in an increasingly protectionist global market. "The reaction that I'm seeing... is frustration, sadness, confusion, they don't know what to do, and the rules continue to change, but with steel and aluminum, you almost can't manufacture things like cars, machinery and aircraft and parts. You can't do it without steel and aluminum, so everyone's going to have to shift their sourcing to the US or pay 50% and companies are really just struggling with what to do ." ~ Michelle Schulz About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Steel tariffs have doubled... what's the impact on Granite City Steel? June 11, 2025 The Chris and Amy Show KMOX Radio St. Louis Michelle Schulz , Founder and Managing Partner at Schulz Trade Law , joins the show to talk about the Trump administration's tariffs on steel and aluminum, and how it impacts local steel manufacturer Granite City Steel. The Double-Edged Sword of Domestic Protectionism The recent doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum—echoing Trump-era policy—has placed domestic manufacturers in a bind. While the move is intended to bolster U.S. steelmakers, it significantly raises costs downstream. “When we put 50% tariffs on steel, we're actually increasing the price of products that are made from steel… manufacturers have to choose: import at 50% or buy U.S. steel, which is more expensive.” — Michelle Schulz Michelle notes that while sectors like steel production see temporary boosts, broader manufacturing jobs suffer due to increased costs. During Trump’s first term, for instance, 1,000 steel jobs were gained, but an estimated 80,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs were lost because of downstream price hikes. The Hidden Cost to Consumers and Communities Beyond industrial trade-offs, Schulz emphasized the real-world effects on communities and consumers. From pharmaceuticals to insulin syringes, higher steel prices are quietly inflating essential goods and services. “There’s steel in so many things… I’ve talked to pharmaceutical companies about needles. At least twice as much for a flu shot needle. That flows down to every one of us.” — Michelle Schulz While Granite City Steel and similar plants may benefit in the short term, she warns the outcome may not be sustainable. U.S. steel remains costly—even with tariffs in place—leaving businesses no clear, affordable path. Legal Gray Areas and Economic Manipulation The use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify tariffs is raising legal alarms. Originally meant for wartime emergencies, Schulz and the Court of International Trade question its misuse. “The tariffs he’s imposing under IEEPA are intended for wartime… even the CIT thinks there’s some illegal stuff going on.” — Michelle Schulz She points to a concerning trend of political favoritism, where companies aligned with the administration could receive favorable exemptions. “We're seeing some companies treated more favorably,” Schulz notes, “especially after the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was paused, which regulates bribery.” Closing Thought on Steel Tariffs In the face of rising costs, staffing shortages, and legal controversy, Schulz concludes that U.S. businesses are scrambling to minimize loss, seeking legal duty reduction strategies or, in some cases, illegal shortcuts. “Our clients are really hustling to pay the lowest duty possible or take advantage of special duty programs. Unfortunately, some companies—not mine—are going illegal routes.” KMOX Radio, St. Louis  // @kmoxnews Show:   The Chris and Amy Show // @TheShowKMOX // https://www.instagram.com/%20theshowkmox/ Host:  Amy Marxkors. // @AmyMarxkors . and Chris Rongey @ChrisRongey About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.

Impact of New Steel and Aluminum Tariffs on U.S. Businesses WBAP Morning News WBAP Radio, Dallas-Fort Worth June 5, 2025 On June 5, 2025, Michelle Schulz , Founder and Managing Partner  of Schulz Trade Law , joined the WBAP Morning Show in Dallas-Fort Worth to discuss the implications of the newly implemented 50% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum. Hosted by Ernie Brown, Karl Marion, and Jay, the conversation shed light on how these tariffs, enacted under Section 232, are reshaping the landscape for U.S. businesses and consumers alike. Below, we dive deeper into the key points raised during the interview and explore the broader economic ramifications. The Scope of the Tariffs The tariffs, which target imported steel and aluminum, have far-reaching consequences due to the widespread use of these materials in various industries. As Schulz explained, steel and aluminum are integral components in products ranging from automobiles and aircraft to everyday items like wire cables. The tariff provisions are notably broad, meaning even small components containing steel or aluminum derivatives may be subject to the 50% duty. This expansive coverage has caught many manufacturers off guard, forcing them to reassess their supply chains and cost structures. Approximately 25% of the steel used in the U.S. is imported, meaning domestic production alone cannot fully meet demand. Industries such as automotive and aerospace, which rely heavily on steel, are particularly vulnerable to these changes. Schulz noted that aircraft manufacturing is currently under review for similar tariff measures, signaling potential further disruptions. Supply Chain Disruptions and Compliance Challenges One of the immediate effects of the tariffs is a slowdown in the movement of goods. Schulz highlighted an increase in seizures and detentions at U.S. ports as customs authorities enforce the new regulations. Businesses are now tasked with verifying the country of origin for their imports and ensuring accurate tariff codes, a process that is both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Even customs brokers, who facilitate the import process, are experiencing delays as they navigate the heightened scrutiny. These disruptions are forcing companies to pause and reevaluate their sourcing strategies. For some, this means shifting to domestic suppliers, but as Schulz pointed out, locally sourced steel and aluminum often come at a premium compared to the previously "dirt cheap" imported alternatives. This shift is likely to drive up production costs, which could ripple through the supply chain and ultimately reach consumers. Economic Impacts on Businesses and Consumers The economic implications of the tariffs are significant. For businesses, the increased cost of raw materials like steel and aluminum translates to higher production expenses. Companies that once relied on affordable imported materials must now either absorb these costs or pass them on to customers. Schulz predicted that consumers will likely bear the brunt of these changes, as the prices of goods—from cars to household products—are expected to rise. The tariffs also pose a challenge to U.S. competitiveness in global markets. Manufacturers that rely on imported steel to keep costs low may find it harder to compete with foreign companies unaffected by these duties. Additionally, the administrative burden of compliance, including verifying supply chain details and navigating customs processes, adds another layer of complexity for businesses already grappling with tight margins. Looking Ahead: Navigating the New Trade Landscape The introduction of 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum marks a pivotal moment for U.S. trade policy. While the measures aim to protect domestic industries, they also introduce new challenges for manufacturers, importers, and consumers. Businesses must adapt by exploring alternative sourcing options, optimizing supply chain logistics, and preparing for potential cost increases. For consumers, the tariffs may mean higher prices for everyday goods, underscoring the interconnectedness of global trade and local economies. Michelle Schulz’s insights on the WBAP Morning Show highlight the need for businesses to stay informed and agile in response to evolving trade policies. As the effects of these tariffs continue to unfold, firms like Schulz Trade Law will play a critical role in helping clients navigate the complexities of compliance and minimize disruptions. WBAP Morning News @WBAP247NEWS Hosts : Ernie Brown  and Carla Marion, @CarlaWbap About Us We are a dedicated team of trade law professionals, committed to helping businesses navigate the complexities of international regulations and tariffs. With deep industry knowledge and a client-first approach, we provide clear, actionable insights to protect your interests and drive success in a dynamic global market. Contact Us Stay ahead of trade law changes! Contact us today for guidance on tariffs and regulations to safeguard your business.